BIG5 of the Week 〔FEB 19-25〕

  • Elizabeth Warren’s ‘Big Fight’ Against Monopolies

    Twitter Elizabeth Warren: ‘There’s this belief, when it comes to tech companies, that when people don’t pay up front, there’s no antitrust concern. But that’s a myth. Data is power.’

  • Insight on the recent Roche/Novartis decision of the Court of Justice of the EU

    CJEU_Logo.pngTwitter An agreement between pharmaceutical companies to spread misleading information about the effects of a drug can be a violation of competition law because it can affect the prescriptions given by doctors.


  • The Case Against Google 

    NYT Article.pngTwitter NYT: If you love Google, you should hope for antitrust investigations. There is no better method for keeping the marketplace creative than a legal system that intervenes whenever a company, no matter how beloved, grows so large as to blot out the sun.


  • Trump Antitrust Cop Splits With EU Over Probes of Big Tech

    Twitter DOJ antitrust chief: The EU stance towards digital platforms ‘might stifle the very innovation that has created dynamic competition for the benefit of consumers’.


  • European Commission fines maritime car carriers and car parts suppliers for collusion

    EC Logo.png
    Twitter European Commission fines multiple companies (including Bosch and Continental) for participating in a cartel while supplying car parts.


Updates from The Antitrust

  • Whatever happened to ‘View Image’?

    settled with Getty Images to save itself from another potential fine from the European Commission.



〔FEB 19-25〕

Whatever happened to ‘View Image’?

Noticed any changes while navigating Google the past few days? If not, maybe you’re not a Google Images fanatic. Google made a massive alteration to its image search service. It removed the ‘view image’ button that enabled users to skip having to visit individual websites to get access to a picture. This was part of a compromise made with Getty Images to drop its case against them at the European Commission – the top antitrust enforcer of the EU.


In 2016, Getty filed a complaint to the Commission against Google’s ‘scraping’ practices. Scraping is the practice of collecting, copying and presenting content from competing websites. Every Google search inquiry involves some scraping activity. If Gardening Tips.pngyou search for gardening tips, Google reads a vast number of websites and presents the most relevant information to you. Google developed its search engine as to enable itself to present the information that you need without leaving the Google Search website. This has a negative effect on websites that lose web visitors and, therefore, advertising revenue.


The complaint made by Getty was concerned with the way in which Google conducted its image searches. Prior to 2013, Google presented its image results in low resolution. For this reason, an end-user who wanted a high-resolution image had to visit the source site of the image to get it. After a change in its service in January 2013, Google started presenting image search results in high resolution. Pirate.pngThat, in combination with the ‘view image’ button that enabled users to skip host websites and to view downloadable images in a single click, facilitated copyright piracy and negatively impacted the ability of artists and photographers to monetize their endeavours.


To combat the practice, Getty complained to the European Commission, arguing that Google’s practices were anticompetitive. News Corp, the parent company of the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post, joined-in the complaint. The Commission took note of the scraping allegations and Competition Commissioner Vestager didn’t rule out the possibility of taking action against it in the future. To appease the concerns of these companies, Google concluded a settlement with Getty. According to the agreement, Google would remove the ‘view image’ button from its image search service. This would require internet users to visit image-hosting websites to download pictures in return for payment or copyright attribution.


While the agreement might appear to be a victory for artists in the digital era, the changes have only made image piracy more difficult, not impossible. Using a different search engine or downloading an image through the code explorer of an internet browser (for the more tech-savvy) is still an option. The only guaranteed assurance against online image piracy still remains the unappealing picture watermark.



BIG5 of the Week〔Feb 12-18〕

  • The Competition Authority of Germany – its case against Facebook:

    UntitledTwitter Competition law may prohibit the merging of data from WhatsApp and Instagram with Facebook profiles. The data merging potentially gives Facebook an unfair competitive advantage in attracting advertisers that violates antitrust rules.   

  • [Opinion] Break Up the Tech Giants intelligence² debate:

    Untitled 2Twitter Prof. Pinar Akman: To decide to break up the GAFAM tech giants, we must be convinced that the market is not competitive, that the tech giants engaged in harmful conduct and that breaking them up is necessary and proportionate. There is no evidence to support this.

  • Price-fixing penalty imposed on Samsung upheld in Japan:


    Twitter Supreme Court rules that competition law can apply to price-fixing of products supplied to customers outside Japan.


  • MediaPro case closed in Spain:

    CNMCTwitter The CNMC terminated its case against MediaPro - the dominant broadcaster of Champions League and La Liga football leagues. MediaPro committed to license its content to competing broadcasting platforms on fair and non-discriminatory terms.

  • Getty Images settles with Google:

    Twitter Getty Images drops EU scraping complaint after concluding a licensing agreement with Google.



〔Feb 12-18〕